Thursday, November 22, 2012

The escalating conflict and the test of post Arab spring leadership.



Once again the Gaza strip of Palestine is under the deadly assault of Israel’s aggression as their fighter jets and naval vessels continue to pound bombs and missiles on Gaza both by air and sea to eliminate the leadership of Hamas, which they claim is responsible for the intermittent rocket attacks on their so called territory. Right from the day one of surgical strikes on Gaza, Israel has taken a hard stance that they reserve every right to defend and take action against those armed groups which are constantly posing a threat on their national security by attacking with the advanced indigenous rockets having range even to hit the Tel Aviv. Amid the appeals of ceasefire and diplomatic pressure built up by the neighboring Arab countries to stop this barbarism and heinous crime against humanity, which has yielded so far nothing but the death and destruction in Gaza. But the unfettered and unmoved Israel is
 Turing a blind eye and deaf ear to such appeals. Due to the arrogance of power and all-weather support of US, the Israeli response has always been tyrannical, repressive and paramount to the stifling of voice of innocent Palestinians like warning the Hamas of a possible ground attack which can further deteriorate the situation in Gaza. As compared to the 2008 situation when the Middle East was run by the notorious autocratic regimes, who from dawn to dusk of their power remained loyal, faithful to the USA, West and virtually worked as their satellite states have never ever ventured across the line of protest like condemnation and emergency meetings. But if the Post Arab spring leadership fails to match its rhetoric with action, then they too can lose creditability and faith quickly in the Arab world. It’s the first testing time for Muslim brotherhood which is in power in Egypt and Tunisia and being as a mother organization of Hamas to play a crucial role along with Turkey to diffuse the crisis diplomatically without any further escalation of violence. In this context Egypt is mobilizing all the channels of diplomacy and influence to thwart further fatalities in Gaza and bring both the parties on table. The political bravado displayed by the Egypt by sending its prime minster to Gaza followed by the Tunisian foreign minister’s visit to show solidarity with the oppressed people send a clear message to the west that the new post Arab spring leadership is going to respect the sentiment and aspiration of the people for which they were enshrined to power.


The besieged people of Gaza and the limited resources of their government except their determination and firm resolution is no match whatsoever to the internationally groomed and funded force. The latest Israeli butchery against the helpless and unarmed people of Gaza have once again manifested their archaic cruel and barbaric policies on which they are working covertly and their unending honeymoon with the US and West can now transcend the whole geo politics of region. Because the escalating conflict in Gaza has confronted President Mohamed Morsi of Egypt with a wrenching test of his commitments — to his fellow Islamist group Hamas and to Egypt’s landmark peace agreement with Israel. But with Israel increasing their attacks and a possible ground operation looming, Mr. Morsi finds himself in a tighter bind. As Egypt’s first freely elected president, he faces popular demands for a radical break with former President Hosni Mubarak’s perceived acquiescence during an Israeli assault against the Palestinians in 2009. But at the same time, Mr. Morsi desperately needs to preserve the stability of the cold peace with Israel in order to secure Western aid to bring stability of Egypt’s tottering economy. Aware of his divided loyalties, both sides appear to be testing him. Hamas, the offshoot of Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood, is pushing to see how much support it can draw from its ideological big brother now that it governs the largest Arab state. And Israel’s hawkish leadership seems determined to probe the depth of Mr. Morsi’s stated commitment to the peace treaty as well.

Mr. Morsi has so far taken diplomatic steps by recalling Egypt’s ambassador form Tel Aviv and sending prime minister on a solidarity mission to Gaza was just to show his displeasure with Israel. He even appealed to President Obama, the United Nations, the European Union and the Arab League to try to stop the violence and ordered to open Egypt’s borders; hospitals to Gaza residents injured in the clashes and offered military helicopters to transport them. According to the Egyptian state media  Mr.  Morsi along with the top brass army generals inspected the air bases and ordered to prepare land defenses near the Gaza border. He has not, however, threatened to provide military support to Hamas or direct action against Israel. These responses so far appear to be appreciated by the people of Egypt and even his rivals, including the former presidential candidate Amr Moussa, have commended his actions.

Tunisia on the other hand is also toeing the Egypt’s line when they too dispatched their foreign minister to the Gaza to show solidarity with the people of Gaza and send a strong message to Israel that on the Palestinian issue, the new elected Arab leadership is united and can’t allow Israel to commit genocide of innocent Palestinians. As we know in both the countries Muslim brotherhood is in power and during their election campaign Palestine issue was the top priority on their political agenda. Unfortunately the remnant Arab despots are still in deep slumber and the ongoing internal political crisis in their kingdoms can anytime deprive them from power have restricted their protest to the mere formal condemnations. The once known as the roaring lion and the ultimate divine kingdom of Muslims, Saudi Arabia is in complete self-denial because of his old hostility with Iran and its weak foreign policy. However Turkey is eager to join the league and fill the void of Arab leader but her compulsions to join the European Union is making Tayyip Erdoğan little bit circumspect, watchful and his approach towards the Israeli aggression apart from romantic statements have been more diplomatic than diplomatic as they shared on the Syrian crises.

Tailpiece: Mere statements of sympathy, symbolic field visits, and diplomatic activities that are being showcased to address the aggression on Gaza will not scare Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli Prime Minister, who launched the attack for electoral purposes and to challenge the Muslim world that we can bleed you with thousand cuts now and in future at our will. Thus it is both testing time as well as golden opportunity for post Arab spring leadership especially to Muslim brotherhood to stand tall and live up to the expectation of people and put an end to the killing and bloodshed of the Palestinians which is jeopardizing the peace and stability in the Arab world. The Egyptian government has to be the first to do this in order to set an example for Arabs and must force and recognize Israel, if you have even to sever diplomatic and commercial relations with this cruel entity that we do not accept this aggression against the innocent people of Gaza.

for feedback and suggestions do visit: mlnazir.blogspot.com/Mir Writes









Thursday, October 25, 2012

Malala; a talent discovered, distributed by the media outlets to dump the deplorable U.S deeds….



The world polity and media is abuzz with the condemnations, solidarity lead stories over the barbaric attack on a Pakistani school girl Malala yousfzai, who rose to worldwide fame with her BBC Urdu blog which documented her struggle and changes to her local neighborhood as the Taliban destroyed schools and communities in the Swat Valley of Pakistan. The attack on Pakistani education and girl’s rights activist spread like a wild fire in the world and the all credit goes to Pakistani media and the western media machines which discovered this only talent in the war torn country after a long time. The non-stop media coverage to the incident which no doubt is a deplorable and condemnable act by the sick minds pushed the strongest institution of Pakistan on the cross roads whether to react militarily or politically in the tribal areas from where this kind of bizarre and irrational ideology is emanating and have become the safe sanctuaries. These groups are operational in the Pakistan under the umbrella of TTP; a militant outfit striving to impose a Sharia in the country, have in the past couple of years launched a series of deadly attacks on the vital defence installations across the Pakistan resulted huge human and military losses. However, the way some splinter groups with in the TTP have exclusively made Pakistan the center of their operations and are unleashing a reign of terror particularly in the tribal areas and in other parts of country should be taken as a serious threat which needs immediate military counter strategy to nip this menace in the bud before it brought death and destruction at large level. By butchering innocent people, blowing up the schools, attacking worshipers and Pakistan army clearly shows they want to destabilize the country and damage its defence capabilities, which puts them under the radar of suspicion of being the foreign paid agents. It’s absolutely ridiculous by thinking that to fight for a sacred cause it hardly matters whether we plunge the country into the era of Stone Age or leave it a tooth less tiger in the volatile region? The attack on Malala yousfzai should be seen in that context as yet another malicious attempt of such ill minds to tarnish the image of Pakistan as well as of Islam globally and give another opportunity to the anti-Islamic forces to cast an eye on the cannons of Islam so that to use and propagate it as a major fault line in this universal religion, which they love to touch again and again in their columns and talk shows. In reality, Islam has never been against the women education in fact the benefactor of humanity prophet Mohammad (Pbuh) has said, “Acquiring of knowledge is obligatory to every Muslim male and female”. Even woman in Islam enjoys more freedom and falls in the same foot in some cases with the men as for as the socio economical rights are concerned than any other religion. Thus these mislead and ignorant fanatic goons and thugs have nothing to do with the teachings of Islam, so whatever they are doing on the name of so called sacred cause by waging a war within the borders of Pakistan should not be related unnecessarily with the canons of Islam; which teaches tolerance, justice and peace. It’s the moral duty and a testing time for Pakistani law enforcement agencies to pin point these bad eggs and eliminate them quickly, which are stigmatizing the name of Islam and the Muslims across the world by their actions on the behest of some unknown agencies.

The recent attack on a school girl, whose family stood rock solid over the issue of girls education in the times when the swat valley was under the occupation of Pakistani Taliban will not yield anything for their so called sacred cause instead of that they will lose political sympathizers and public support which is oxygen for every movement to stay in the hunt for their long objectives. Everybody knows that the family of Malala Yousfzai had a series of meetings with American military and government officials especially with the U.S special envoy Richard Holbrooke in the Pakistani capital, where they might have been as usual brainwashed and promised economic and political support to go harder and harder against the Taliban ideology. As the Uncle Sam justified the killing of its 2765 citizen in the world trade Centre attack by killing more than two million innocent Iraqi’s same is the case of Malala, which they were planning to execute clinically to hit the all targets of interest. The way Pakistani electronic media along with the international media tried to mobilize the people with in the country and abroad by airing nonstop emotional messages and providing more space to the pseudo seculars was just a conspiracy or a sub plot to put enormous national and international pressure on the Pakistani government to launch an offensive against the Haqqani network which is inflicting more causalities on American troops than any other group fighting in Afghanistan. As it should also be noted that recently American private news channel fox news aired an exclusive report on the Pakistani media where it was revealed that the U.S state department has invested more than ten billion dollars in the Pakistani media in its latest bid to win the support of a public that generally views the US with animosity. Thus obviously the duty was discharged in letter and spirit by the Pakistani media to blow the Malala issue out of proportion round the clock and try to attain something for U.S beyond the human rights issue. They way protests, candlelight vigils special prayers were held in the school, mosques for her speedy recovery and how it has drawn widespread condemnation inside the Pakistan and abroad, which every nation should protest at every such barbaric incidents weather its Malla or Afiya Siddique but here it was done in a systematic way to create public opinion for the south Waziristan operation and nothing else. Due to the excessive media blanket, she emerged as a symbol of resistance on both national as well as international scene, who fought head on with the Taliban in their own strong bastion on the girl’s education. But one failed to understand why those are being portrayed and projected as devils by both print and electronic media, who are up against the foreign occupation in Afghanistan.



After the fall of Pakistani Taliban in the swat valley, Malala Yousfzai vigorously start working for the empowerment of women backed by the many mysterious NGO’s which many independent political analysts believe made her toy in the hands of liberal extremists whom used her at their will. As one can presume by analyzing their political tantrums and apprehensions that there is some kind of nexus growing between the liberals and media in the Pakistan which is fully backed by the U.S and India to pursue their covet doctrines which is to de-nuclearize the country. The so called civil society of Pakistan and the secular political forces especially the MQM, which is mostly responsible for the unabated target killings in Karachi suddenly, start beating the chest and shedding crocodile tears by labeling it an attack on the daughters of nation. They tried their best to stoke the anger but unfortunately failed to do so as the people in Pakistani are fully aware that these political parties are hand in glove with the U.S and are their collaborators in killing the innocent tribal people in the Drone attacks. These politicians were even exposed by the Wikileaks and memo gate scandal which send shocking tremors across the Pakistan that how an ambassador in the Washington under the present government issued five thousand visas to the unknown Americans without consulting the home and foreign ministry of the country. It still remained a mystery for the common Pakistani for whom and for what purpose the bulk of visas were issued but one thing is sure that visa holders are very much present on the Pakistani soil in large number and the arrest of spy Raymond Davis was just a trailer of larger American picture. Why didn’t media, politicians, intellectuals, retired military generals made a huge outcry on the treachery of Dr Shakeel Afridi, who played a vital role to gather human intelligence regarding Osama bin laden in the disguise of polio vaccine campaigner? Why they become dumb doll and forget another daughter of nation Dr Afiya Siddique’s, which is a living shame on the justice system of west? If Malala’s misery can brought tears in the eyes of Pakistani interior minister, then why he didn’t uttered a word of solidarity and condemnation when the another daughter of nation was sexually abused and shot during the interrogation across the shores by non-Muslims ? Why he didn’t bring a resolution in the senate when the innocent ninety madrassa students were slained by a U.S drone strike? These double standards, loyalty, appeasement policy and fractured ideology will not help you any more to stay in power because the winds of change are blowing across the Pakistan and the coming election will prove to be the political graveyard for such politicians. The great nations never made any distinction or discrimination of their citizens nor they polarize the country on the sensitive issues because the unity, equality and justice are the pillars on which the country depends and guarantees bright future. But unfortunately the way own Pakistani politicians and media are trying to shake the very roots of their country on the Malala issue for few dollars is disgusting and disturbing.



For feedback and suggestions visit @mlnazir.blogspot.com/Mirwrites

Email address: liyaqatn@gmail.com





Tuesday, October 2, 2012

A Brief History of the English Language



A Brief History of the English Language
English is a member of the Indo-European family of languages. This broad family includes most of the European languages spoken today. The Indo-European family includes several major branches: Latin and the modern Romance languages (French etc.); the Germanic languages (English, German, Swedish etc.); the Indo-Iranian languages (Hindi, Urdu, Sanskrit etc.); the Slavic languages (Russian, Polish, Czech etc.); the Baltic languages of Latvian and Lithuanian; the Celtic languages (Welsh, Irish Gaelic etc.); Greek.
The influence of the original Indo-European language can be seen today, even though no written record of it exists. The word for father, for example, is vater in German, pater in Latin, and pitrin Sanskrit. These words are all cognates, similar words in different languages that share the same root. Of these branches of the Indo-European family, two are, as far as the study of the development of English is concerned, of paramount importance, the Germanic and the Romance (called that because the Romance languages derive from Latin, the language of ancient Rome). English is a member of the Germanic group of languages. It is believed that this group began as a common language in the Elbe river region about 3,000 years ago. By the second century BC, this Common Germanic language had split into three distinct sub-groups:

East Germanic was spoken by peoples who migrated back to southeastern Europe. No East Germanic language is spoken today, and the only written East Germanic language that survives is Gothic.North Germanic evolved into the modern Scandinavian languages of Swedish, Danish, Norwegian, and Icelandic (but not Finnish, which is related to Hungarian and Estonian and is not an Indo-European language). West Germanic is the ancestor of modern German, Dutch, Flemish, Frisian, and English.

Old English (500-1100 AD)
West Germanic invaders from Jutland and southern Denmark: the Angles (whose name is the source of the words England and English), Saxons, and Jutes, began to settle in the British Isles in the fifth and sixth centuries AD. They spoke a mutually intelligible language, similar to modern Frisian – the language of the northeastern region of the Netherlands – that is called Old English. Four major dialects of Old English emerged, Northumbrian in the north of England, Mercian in the Midlands, West Saxon in the south and west, and Kentish in the Southeast.

These invaders pushed the original, Celtic-speaking inhabitants out of what is now England into Scotland, Wales, Cornwall, and Ireland, leaving behind a few Celtic words. These Celtic languages survive today in the Gaelic languages of Scotland and Ireland and in Welsh. Cornish, unfortunately, is, in linguistic terms, now a dead language. (The last native Cornish speaker died in 1777) Also influencing English at this time were the Vikings. Norse invasions and settlement, beginning around 850, brought many North Germanic words into the language, particularly in the north of England. Some examples are dream, which had meant ‘joy’ until the Vikings imparted its current meaning on it from the Scandinavian cognate draumr, and skirt, which continues to live alongside its native English cognate shirt.

The majority of words in modern English come from foreign, not Old English roots. In fact, only about one sixth of the known Old English words have descendants surviving today. But this is deceptive; Old English is much more important than these statistics would indicate. About half of the most commonly used words in modern English have Old English roots. Words like be,water, and strong, for example, derive from Old English roots. Old English, whose best known surviving example is the poem Beowulf, lasted until about 1100.
The Norman Conquest and Middle English (1100-1500)

William the Conqueror, the Duke of Normandy, invaded and conquered England and the Anglo-Saxons in 1066 AD. The new overlords spoke a dialect of Old French known as Anglo-Norman. The Normans were also of Germanic stock (“Norman” comes from “Norseman”) and Anglo-Norman was a French dialect that had considerable Germanic influences in addition to the basic Latin roots.

Prior to the Norman Conquest, Latin had been only a minor influence on the English language, mainly through vestiges of the Roman occupation and from the conversion of Britain to Christianity in the seventh century (ecclesiastical terms such as priest, vicar, and mass came into the language this way), but now there was a wholesale infusion of Romance (Anglo-Norman) words.
The influence of the Normans can be illustrated by looking at two words, beef and cow. Beef, commonly eaten by the aristocracy, derives from the Anglo-Norman, while the Anglo-Saxon commoners, who tended the cattle, retained the Germanic cow. Many legal terms, such asindict, jury , and verdict have Anglo-Norman roots because the Normans ran the courts. This split, where words commonly used by the aristocracy have Romantic roots and words frequently used by the Anglo-Saxon commoners have Germanic roots, can be seen in many instances.

Sometimes French words replaced Old English words; crime replaced firen and uncle replacedeam. Other times, French and Old English components combined to form a new word, as the French gentle and the Germanic man formed gentleman. Other times, two different words with roughly the same meaning survive into modern English. Thus we have the Germanic doom and the French judgment, or wish and desire. It is useful to compare various versions of a familiar text to see the differences between Old, Middle, and Modern English. Take for instance this Old English (c. 1000) sample:

    Fæder ure þu þe eart on heofonum 
    si þin nama gehalgod tobecume þin rice gewurþe þin willa on eorðan swa swa on heofonum
    urne gedæghwamlican hlaf syle us to dæg
    and forgyf us ure gyltas swa swa we forgyfað urum gyltendum
    and ne gelæd þu us on costnunge ac alys us of yfele soþlice.



Rendered in Middle English (Wyclif, 1384), the same text is recognizable to the modern eye:

    Oure fadir þat art in heuenes halwid be þi name; 
    þi reume or kyngdom come to be. Be þi wille don in herþe as it is doun in heuene.
    yeue to us today oure eche dayes bred.
    And foryeue to us oure dettis þat is oure synnys as we foryeuen to oure dettouris þat is to men þat han synned in us.
    And lede us not into temptacion but delyuere us from euyl.

Finally, in Early Modern English (King James Version, 1611) the same text is completely intelligible:

    Our father which art in heauen, hallowed be thy name. 
    Thy kingdom come. Thy will be done in earth as it is in heauen.
    Giue us this day our daily bread.
    And forgiue us our debts as we forgiue our debters.
    And lead us not into temptation, but deliuer us from euill. Amen.

    For a lengthier comparison of the three stages in the development of English click here!

In 1204 AD, King John lost the province of Normandy to the King of France. This began a process where the Norman nobles of England became increasingly estranged from their French cousins. England became the chief concern of the nobility, rather than their estates in France, and consequently the nobility adopted a modified English as their native tongue. About 150 years later, the Black Death (1349-50) killed about one third of the English population. And as a result of this the labouring and merchant classes grew in economic and social importance, and along with them English increased in importance compared to Anglo-Norman.

This mixture of the two languages came to be known as Middle English. The most famous example of Middle English is Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales. Unlike Old English, Middle English can be read, albeit with difficulty, by modern English-speaking people.

By 1362, the linguistic division between the nobility and the commoners was largely over. In that year, the Statute of Pleading was adopted, which made English the language of the courts and it began to be used in Parliament.

The Middle English period came to a close around 1500 AD with the rise of Modern English.

Early Modern English (1500-1800)

The next wave of innovation in English came with the Renaissance. The revival of classical scholarship brought many classical Latin and Greek words into the Language. These borrowings were deliberate and many bemoaned the adoption of these “inkhorn” terms, but many survive to this day. Shakespeare’s character Holofernes in Loves Labor Lost is a satire of an overenthusiastic schoolmaster who is too fond of Latinisms.

Many students having difficulty understanding Shakespeare would be surprised to learn that he wrote in modern English. But, as can be seen in the earlier example of the Lord’s Prayer, Elizabethan English has much more in common with our language today than it does with the language of Chaucer. Many familiar words and phrases were coined or first recorded by Shakespeare, some 2,000 words and countless idioms are his. Newcomers to Shakespeare are often shocked at the number of cliches contained in his plays, until they realize that he coined them and they became cliches afterwards. “One fell swoop,” “vanish into thin air,” and “flesh and blood” are all Shakespeare’s. Words he bequeathed to the language include “critical,” “leapfrog,” “majestic,” “dwindle,” and “pedant.”

Two other major factors influenced the language and served to separate Middle and Modern English. The first was the Great Vowel Shift. This was a change in pronunciation that began around 1400. While modern English speakers can read Chaucer with some difficulty, Chaucer’s pronunciation would have been completely unintelligible to the modern ear. Shakespeare, on the other hand, would be accented, but understandable. Vowel sounds began to be made further to the front of the mouth and the letter “e” at the end of words became silent. Chaucer’s Lyf(pronounced “leef”) became the modern life. In Middle English name was pronounced “nam-a,”five was pronounced “feef,” and down was pronounced “doon.” In linguistic terms, the shift was rather sudden, the major changes occurring within a century. The shift is still not over, however, vowel sounds are still shortening although the change has become considerably more gradual.

The last major factor in the development of Modern English was the advent of the printing press. William Caxton brought the printing press to England in 1476. Books became cheaper and as a result, literacy became more common. Publishing for the masses became a profitable enterprise, and works in English, as opposed to Latin, became more common. Finally, the printing press brought standardization to English. The dialect of London, where most publishing houses were located, became the standard. Spelling and grammar became fixed, and the first English dictionary was published in 1604.

Late-Modern English (1800-Present)

The principal distinction between early- and late-modern English is vocabulary. Pronunciation, grammar, and spelling are largely the same, but Late-Modern English has many more words. These words are the result of two historical factors. The first is the Industrial Revolution and the rise of the technological society. This necessitated new words for things and ideas that had not previously existed. The second was the British Empire. At its height, Britain ruled one quarter of the earth’s surface, and English adopted many foreign words and made them its own.

The industrial and scientific revolutions created a need for neologisms to describe the new creations and discoveries. For this, English relied heavily on Latin and Greek. Words like oxygen,protein, nuclear, and vaccine did not exist in the classical languages, but they were created from Latin and Greek roots. Such neologisms were not exclusively created from classical roots though, English roots were used for such terms as horsepower, airplane, and typewriter.

This burst of neologisms continues today, perhaps most visible in the field of electronics and computers. Byte, cyber-, bios, hard-drive, and microchip are good examples.

Also, the rise of the British Empire and the growth of global trade served not only to introduce English to the world, but to introduce words into English. Hindi, and the other languages of the Indian subcontinent, provided many words, such as pundit, shampoo, pajamas, and juggernaut. Virtually every language on Earth has contributed to the development of English, from Finnish (sauna) and Japanese (tycoon) to the vast contributions of French and Latin.

The British Empire was a maritime empire, and the influence of nautical terms on the English language has been great. Phrases like three sheets to the wind have their origins onboard ships.

Finally, the military influence on the language during the latter half of twentieth century was significant. Before the Great War, military service for English-speaking persons was rare; both Britain and the United States maintained small, volunteer militaries. Military slang existed, but with the exception of nautical terms, rarely influenced standard English. During the mid-20th century, however, a large number of British and American men served in the military. And consequently military slang entered the language like never before. Blockbuster, nose dive, camouflage, radar, roadblock, spearhead, and landing strip are all military terms that made their way into standard English.




American English and other varieties

Also significant beginning around 1600 AD was the English colonization of North America and the subsequent creation of American English. Some pronunciations and usages “froze” when they reached the American shore. In certain respects, some varieties of American English are closer to the English of Shakespeare than modern Standard English (‘English English‘ or as it is often incorrectly termed ‘British English’) is. Some “Americanisms” are actually originally EnglishEnglish expressions that were preserved in the colonies while lost at home (e.g., fall as a synonym for autumn, trash for rubbish, and loan as a verb instead of lend).

The American dialect also served as the route of introduction for many native American words into the English language. Most often, these were place names like Mississippi, Roanoke, andIowa. Indian-sounding names like Idaho were sometimes created that had no native-American roots. But, names for other things besides places were also common. Raccoon, tomato, canoe, barbecue, savanna, and hickory have native American roots, although in many cases the original Indian words were mangled almost beyond recognition.

Spanish has also been great influence on American English. Mustang, canyon, ranch, stampede,and vigilante are all examples of Spanish words that made their way into English through the settlement of the American West.

A lesser number of words have entered American English from French and West African languages.

Likewise dialects of English have developed in many of the former colonies of the British Empire. There are distinct forms of the English language spoken in Australia, New Zealand, South Africa, India and many other parts of the world.

 Global English
English has now inarguably achieved global status. Whenever we turn on the news to find out what’s happening in East Asia, or the Balkans, or Africa, or South America, or practically anywhere, local people are being interviewed and telling us about it in English. To illustrate the point when Pope John Paul II arrived in the Middle East recently to retrace Christ’s footsteps and addressed Christians, Muslims and Jews, the pontiff spoke not Latin, not Arabic, not Italian, not Hebrew, not his native Polish. He spoke in English.

Indeed, if one looks at some of the facts about the amazing reach of  the English language many would be surprised. English is used in over 90 countries as an official or semi-official language. English is the working language of the Asian trade group ASEAN. It is the de facto working language of 98 percent of international research physicists and research chemists. It is the official language of the European Central Bank, even though the bank is in Frankfurt and neither Britain nor any other predominantly English-speaking country is a member of the European Monetary Union. It is the language in which Indian parents and black parents in South Africa overwhelmingly wish their children to be educated. It is believed that over one billion people worldwide are currently learning English.

One of the more remarkable aspects of the spread of English around the world has been the extent to which Europeans are adopting it as their internal lingua franca. English is spreading from northern Europe to the south and is now firmly entrenched as a second language in countries such as Sweden, Norway, Netherlands and Denmark. Although not an official language in any of these countries if one visits any of them it would seem that almost everyone there can communicate with ease in English. Indeed, if one switches on a television in Holland one would find as many channels in English (albeit subtitled), as there are in Dutch.

As part of the European Year of Languages,  a special survey of European attitudes towards and their use of languages has just published. The report confirms that at the beginning of 2001 English is the most widely known foreign or second language, with 43% of Europeans claiming they speak it in addition to their mother tongue. Sweden now heads the league table of English speakers, with over 89% of the population saying they can speak the language well or very well. However, in contrast, only 36% of Spanish and Portuguese nationals speak English.  What’s more, English is the language rated as most useful to know, with over 77% of Europeans who do not speak English as their first language, rating it as useful. French rated 38%, German 23% and Spanish 6%

 English has without a doubt become the global language.


A Chronology of the English Language
449    Anglo-Saxon settlement of Britain begins
450-480      Earliest Old English inscriptions date from this period
597    St. Augustine arrives in Britain. Beginning of Christian conversion
731    The Venerable Bede publishes The Ecclesiastical History of the English People in Latin
792    Viking raids and settlements begin
871    Alfred becomes king of Wessex. He has Latin works translated into English and begins practice of English prose. The Anglo-Saxon Chronicle is begun
911    Charles II of France grants Normandy to the Viking chief Hrolf the Ganger. The beginning of Norman French
c. 1000 The oldest surviving manuscript of Beowulf dates from this period
1066 The Norman conquest
c. 1150  The oldest surviving manuscripts of Middle English date from this period
1171 Henry II conquers Ireland
1204 King John loses the province of Normandy to France
1348 English replaces Latin as the medium of instruction in schools, other than Oxford and Cambridge which retain Latin
1362 The Statute of Pleading replaces French with English as the language of law. Records continue to be kept in Latin. English is used in Parliament for the first time
1384 Wyclif publishes his English translation of the Bible
c. 1388        Chaucer begins The Canterbury Tales
1476 William Caxton establishes the first English printing press
1492 Columbus discovers the New World
1549 First version of The Book of Common Prayer
1604 Robert Cawdrey publishes the first English dictionary, Table Alphabeticall
1607 Jamestown, the first permanent English settlement in the New World, established
1611 The Authorized, or King James Version, of the Bible is published
1702 Publication of the first daily, English-language newspaper, The Daily Courant, in London
1755 Samuel Johnson publishes his dictionary
1770 Cook discovers Australia
1928 The Oxford English Dictionary is published

Monday, August 20, 2012



The unabated genocide of Muslims in Burma and the fragmented Muslim leadership…

The unabated ethnic cleansing of Muslims in the Burma is not a new thing which the world suddenly came to know, thanks to the continuous social media exposés, but in the past too, it has been the part of covet agenda perused by both ruling militarily regime as well as the Aung San Suu Kyi’s crusaders of democracy to uproot this minority permanently from the western Burma. Defying all the international laws and brazenly violating the human rights, Burma has launched time and again a deadly campaign of violence and round ups in collaboration with the Buddhist extremists to flush out the Rohingya Muslims in the western state of Arakan.  But this time the ethnic cleansing campaign of Rohingya’s is horrific and heart wrenching than ever before as the pictures and videos surfaced on the various social media sites showed the extreme suffering, agony and brutality inflicted on them. The Burma has a diverse ethnic and religious make-up, but the Rohingya Muslims which numbered more than 800,000 in the country are neither treated as the citizen of Burma nor recognized as one of its ethnic group by the Burmese ruling regime. It is not the first time that the most persecuted minority of the world according to the United Nations are facing state sponsored holocaust but from the last sixty years this community has witnessed five bloodied communal clashes in which thousands of Rohingya Muslims were silenced forever by the country which propagates and practices lord Buddha’s nonviolent philosophy of life. The latest spate of communal clashes erupted when a public transport bus in which local Rohingya Muslims including the members of Tableeghi Jamaat were travelling was attacked with sharp weapons and set on blaze by the Buddhist extremists. The bus had left the capital Rangoon and was on the way to Arakan state but when it reached the Taiyang Gog district, it came under the attack of armed Buddhist rioters resulted the horrific death of ten innocent people affiliated to this organization and seriously wounded twenty five others. However there is another dimension of the story also, which many independent sources believe became the catalyst for communal violence and hatred in the area, when two Buddhist girls of an orthodox Buddhist family embraced Islam. The family with the help of militant Bodo organizations plundered, arsoned the houses and raped muslin women living in the vicinity so that to put every sort of pressure to bring them back into Buddhism but their every pressure tactics couldn’t shake their newly faith. Thus it provided the stimulus for ruling regime and the Buddhist extremists to launch another barbaric campaign to uproot the Rohingya Muslims from the western coastal state.  This barbarism and gruesome violence perpetrated by the Burmese security forces in this part of country was even endorsed by the Burmese premiers’ remark on the state television that these people don’t belong to Burma and the UNHCR should make an adequate arrangement to settle them in the third country.  
Brad Adams, Asia director at Human Rights Watch says “The government claims it is committed to end ethnic strife and abuse, but recent events in Arakan State demonstrate that state-sponsored persecution and discrimination persist."
According to Amnesty International, the Muslim Rohingya people have continued to suffer from human rights violations under the Burmese military regime and the extremists since 1978, as a result thousands of people have fled from the state of Arakan and have taken shelter in neighboring Bangladesh. They are also subjected to various forms of extortion and arbitrary taxation; land confiscation; forced eviction and house destruction; and financial restrictions on marriage. Rohingyas continue to be used as forced labourers on roads and at military camps, although the amount of forced labour in northern Rakhine State has decreased over the last decade."   In 1978 over 200,000 Rohingyas fled to Bangladesh, following the notorious ‘Dragon King’ operation of the Myanmar army. Officially this military  campaign directly targeted civilians, and resulted in widespread killings, rape and destruction of mosques and further religious persecution .During 1991-92 a new wave of over a quarter of a million Rohingyas fled to Bangladesh. They reported widespread forced labour, as well as summary executions, torture, and rape. Rohingyas were forced to work without pay by the Burmese army on infrastructure and economic projects, often under harsh conditions. Many other human rights violations occurred in the context of forced labour of Rohingya civilians by the security forces.

Despite earlier efforts by the UN, the vast majority of Rohingya refugees have remained in Bangladesh, unable to return because of the negative attitude of the ruling regime in Myanmar. Now they are facing problems in Bangladesh as well where they do not receive support from the government any longer. This hostile attitude of Bangladeshi government against this oppressed community by not allowing them to enter their territory and let them die in the cruel spates of bay of Bengal and get killed in the hand of Burmese security forces clearly shows how deep is running the spirit of Muslim brotherhood in the so called Bangla Muslim political leadership. This government is even taking steps to expatriate them living in the various refugee camps in Bangladesh from so many decades. In between the lines neither the conciouslesss Muslim world nor the defenders of democracy and human rights organizations or the so called Muslim liberals are reaching out to this oppressed community so that to mount a political pressure on the Burmese military regime to abort the violence and give them their basic rights. They don’t want independence or have not waged a war against the state but they demand equal rights and security from the Rangoon.  Maybe it’s not the East Timor or the South Sudan where the Non-Muslims were up against the Muslim state and how the whole world rallied behind them till they achieve their nationhood but here it’s the blood of Muslims which is being made cheap or as flies to the wanton boys by the west and the corrupt Muslim rulers. The fabricated video of flogging of woman in Sawat valley can make the so called west and their media machines to go microwave and malign the cannons of Islam but when it boils down to serious and genuine issues related to the Muslims world they usually turn a blind eye. If such brutalities and barbarism is being perpetrated against any non-Muslim community, the western press, UN and NGO’s would have raised an outcry.  If the OIC was alive and Muslims rulers had a sense of honour left, they should endeavor to stop the bloodshed of the Arakan Muslims going on in the hands of Buddhist extremists. This double standard policy of west is expected as they have waged a war against the Islamic civilization after the fall of Soviet Union but the more interesting thing is the criminal silence of media houses belonging to Muslim world over the this grave issue is really disgusting and disturbing. If the Burmese regime and Buddhists extremists succeed in their nefarious designs then it will be a second country in the world after Spain. Its wake up call for all the Muslim countries including the gulf satellite states of America to pull up the socks and stop the genocide of Rohingya Muslims but so for as usual they are watching like spectators apart from the press statements except the Turkish prime minster, how disgraceful land shameful its and the history will never forgive such cnnciousless Muslim rulers if it happen again.

@mlnazir.blogspot.com/mliyaqat@facebook.com


Wednesday, August 8, 2012

 PROFILE

 PROFILE

Grizzly-bearded, baggy-suited and humble in manner, Muhammad Morsi, Egypt’s new head of state concluded the odyssey of 80-years wait and relentless sacrifices given by Muslim Brotherhood under the various despots for this yearning political goal. Born in 1951 in a rambling brick house where geese and ducks roamed freely in the dusty Nile Delta village of Edwa, north of Cairo. Being the eldest one among of five brothers, his father used to took him to school on the back of a donkey. He received a Bachelor's and Master's Degree in engineering from Cairo University in 1975 and 1978, when these seats of learning in the Egypt were the hotbed of Muslim Brotherhood Islamic activities. He then received his PhD in engineering from the University of Southern California in the U.S in 1982. He was an Assistant Professor at California State University, Northridge, from 1982 to 1985. In 1985, he returned to Egypt to teach at Zagazig University. Morsi is married to Nagla Ali Mahmoud. She reportedly stated that she does not want to be referred to as "First Lady" but rather "First Servant of the Egyptian public". Two of Morsi's five children were born in California and are U.S. citizens by birth.
Morsi was a Member of Parliament in the People's Assembly of Egypt from 2000 to 2005 and a leading figure in the Muslim Brotherhood. He became Chairman of the Freedom and Justice Party (FJP), a political party, when it was founded by the Muslim Brotherhood in the wake of the 2011 Egyptian revolution. He stood as the FJP's candidate for the May–June 2012 presidential election.

Morsi served as a Member of Parliament representing Zagazig from 2000 to 2005; he was elected as an independent candidate because the Brotherhood was technically barred from running candidates for office under President Hosni Mubarak. After Khairat El-Shater was disqualified from the 2012 presidential election, Morsi, who was initially nominated as a backup candidate, emerged as the new Muslim Brotherhood candidate. Following the first round of Egypt's first post-Mubarak presidential elections where exit polls suggested a 25.5% share of the vote for Morsi, he was officially announced as the president on the 24th of June 2012 following a subsequent run-off vote. On 24 June 2012, Morsi was announced as the winner of the election with 51.73% of the vote. Almost immediately afterward, he resigned from the presidency of the Muslim Brotherhood.



But it’s said that uneasy lies the head which wears the crown, Morsi’s presidency on domestic policy is still hazy, as Egypt's bureaucracy remains stocked with Mubarak loyalists and could block any changes that Morsi tries to push through. Dealings with the military generals would be a bit trickier, as the recent head-to-head has shown. The Brotherhood wants the military to restore its hold on parliament and by extension its hold on the constitution. The generals seem unwilling to give that up. Morsi seeks to influence the drafting of a new constitution of Egypt. Morsi favors a constitution that protects civil rights, yet is enshrined in Islamic law. It will be great challenge to the Morsi to honor all the Egypt's international treaties signed by the earlier head of state and particularly Egypt's treaty with Israel. The new foreign policy of Egypt under the reign of MB can change the geopolitics of the region which they promised to the electorates in their election campaign.

In a recent press conference Morsi implied that he would attempt to rule by consensus and talked of Egypt being a "civil and democratic" state. He has also promised that his cabinet would reflect national consensus and his premier would be an independent national figure not affiliated with the Brotherhood.

At the same time, Western governments’ reaction to Morsi win shows that the time has come for west to come out of the illusion and acknowledge the verdict of people and stop the Islamophobia bashing. As he again and again pledged and assure the international community that "We will keep all agreements and international treaties we signed with the whole world." Subsequently, he stated that "... it is necessary to return to normal relations with Tehran and strengthen them in order to create a balance at the regional level" because "... the normalisation of relations between Iran and Egypt is in the interest of its peoples can set Egypt at odds with the international community, currently seeking to restrict Iran's access to nuclear weapons. In front of a crowd of Cairo University students he had repeated the historic motto of the MB: "... The Koran is our constitution, the prophet is our guide, jihad is our path and death in the name of God is our goal" are such statements which should be avoided this time otherwise it can jeopardize the whole political game of Muslim Brotherhood.




Egyptian celelebrati the victory of Mohammad Morsi in Cairo

Morsi’s words have been quite clear. It is therefore surprising to see international congratulations pouring in to the new President. Barack Obama called "... to congratulate him on his victory in the presidential elections of Egypt" and to reaffirm that "... the U.S. will continue to support the transition of Egypt toward democracy." In response to those who argued that Egypt’s election of a Muslim Brotherhood President showed that the Arab Spring was a debacle, White House Press Secretary Jay Carney responded: “... we judge individuals and parties that are elected in a democratic process by their actions, not by their religious affiliation.” Italian Foreign Minister Terzi described Morsi’s election "... a step forward in strengthening the institutions and strengthen the friendship with Rome." June 24th, 2012 will be a date to remember not only for Egypt, but also for the West. The proclamation of the Muslim Brotherhood’s candidate, Mohammed Morsi, as the first president of post-Mubarak Egypt confirms that the Arab world is in the midst of an "Islamist Spring".


©mlnazir.blogspot.com/ mliyaqat@facebook.com